Welcome to RUnderground!

...the unassociated voice of Radford University

 
About Us
RUnderground is a Christian-based blogizine (blog/online magazine) run by current and former Radford University students.
What We Do
To properly touch all bases of student interest, RUnderground allows its writers to write about whatever they feel. These topics can range from faith-based, news-related, sports-related, technology-related, entertainment-related or some other topic they so choose.
Our Readership
Reader opinion is important to RUnderground. However, we request that comments be professional. RUnderground reserves the right to censor any comment for the following reasons: language, grammar, vulgarity or any reason where it is felt that a comment censoring is needed.
Disclaimer
The views expressed at this site reflect the views of the authors alone, and do not reflect the views or policies of those who write for RUnderground or Radford University, its students and its employees.
Stay Up-To-Date!
Unlike some magazines that publish one day every week, RUnderground publishes whenever a writer publishes a post. Since this means that posts may be up at anytime, feel free to bookmark us so that you stay up-to-date with the latest at RUnderground. Or, for those who want to receive updates via email, we are now offering an email subscription service provided by FeedBlitz.

If you want to receive email updates, please enter you email address below and hit "Subscribe Me!":



Did Brian Go Too Far?
Wednesday, April 19, 2006
So the hot topic this evening is tonight's Diversity Rally put on by the Young Democrats, SPECTRUM, and Women's Studies (see Brian's post below). I'm sure everyone agrees that Brian's now "infamous" editorial in the Tartan ("Life of blatant, proud sin damages society) is the motivating force behind this rally, and since I've not yet publicly shared my thoughts on the article, I'm going to take this opportunity to do so.

Speaking as a conservative Christian (though my views aren't necessarily representative of all conservative Christians) my feelings for Brian's editorial are a little mixed. I should also point out that Brian (and myself), to the best of my knowledge, speaks from a perspective that the Bible is inerrant and infallible (in short, perfect and contradiction-free), so that must be understood right off the bat. First, one of my problems with the article is that it's not particularly tactful to quote the Book of Leviticus to make the "homosexuality is a sin" point. Leviticus is more or less a set of rules God gave to the Israelites that they essentially needed to stay in right relationship with God, and wasn't intended to form a doctrinal basis for Christians. The reason I say this is because I've too often heard comparisons between Brian's Levitical quotes and other scripture from Leviticus (and other mostly Old Testament passages taken out of context, see this facebook link), that try and make it seem ridiculous to be a Christian if we're expected to follow all these rules, including being "anti-gay". Of course as born-again believers we know that Jesus' sacrifice was sufficient enough to pay that price and that we no longer need to follow a set of rigorous rules to "earn" our way to heaven, whereas the Jews of the day didn't have that luxury. In my opinion the most negative after-effect of Brian's article is the reinforced concept, in some people's minds, that Christianity is just another religion that follows a bunch of pointless "holier-than-thou" rules (again mostly through quoting Leviticus out-of-context). Quite conversely, Christianity is about God's grace through Jesus' sacrifice and faith in Him that frees us from our slavery to sin and religion (aka ritualistic rule-following or legalism), and gives us the best, most fulfilling life possible (not the mention the ONLY path to heaven).

However, don't take what I've just said to mean that I disagree with Brian, because Brian is without question correct about homosexuality being a sin. The New Testament scripture he quoted is more than sufficient to make his point, and the Bible is quite clear that God hates homosexuality (as he does all sin). So for me the question now begs, "Yeah, Brian's certainly right, but what's the point?" I admit I've wavered back and forth in deciding how necessary the article really is based on the points he's trying to make. If the point of the article is to simply state that homosexuality is a sin and Brian's just trying to get attention, as his haters have alleged, then the article probably is unnecessary (and perhaps damaging to the cause of Christ based on the points I made in the last paragraph). But if put in the context of God's redemptive grace and love for all homosexuals and sinners alike, then I would certainly be very favorable of the article. There were certainly glimpses of this when he talked about God's Agape love and premarital heterosexual sex being just as bad (a far cry from the "hate rhetoric" Brian's critics allege, eh?), but it didn't quite go far enough to completely satisfy me. I would personally emphasize that any one sin, no matter how supposedly little it is, is enough to separate a person from God's glory. No human deserves to go to heaven, and it's only by God's grace that any are allowed in (through repentance and acceptance of Jesus as their Savior). Christians therefore are no better than homosexuals or anyone living in sin (we're still sinners in fact); we've simply been made right in God's sight, not by our own actions or anything we've done. I know, that probably wasn't the point Brian was trying to make, but I'm honestly not 100% sure what the point of the editorial was (in general, he never really showed how homosexuality damages society, as the title suggests).

But what's really baffling to me is the response and rhetoric from the critics, mostly from the GLBT community, and this probably more directly relates to tonight's rally. "We will not be silenced!" Um, okay. I've heard this one a bazillion times since the publishing. Who says anyone's trying to silence anybody? I just don't get that at all. I've also heard a lot about how we should be tolerant of everything and how intolerant Brian and other right-wingers are. Um, hello, aren't you being "intolerant" of Brian's point of view? Christians don't pretend to tolerate homosexuality or any sin (but we do love the individual that does the sin); those who believe everyone should be tolerant of everything must admit contradiction. And c'mon, it's a little silly to say that Brian's comments were "threatening" and "sanctioned hate and violence." I know they're using the Levitical quotes for their platform, but no one really believes that Brian was sanctioning violence against gay people; the points he made about God's Agape love and so forth prove otherwise. These people are just grabbing for anything they can to gain sympathy points for their cause. It's amazing how irrationally the critics of Brian's editorial have acted toward something just because it goes against what they believe, even though they're preaching against that that very thing. In general, this whole thing has been a big mess in my view.

posted by Justin Hawks @ 4/19/2006 05:30:00 PM  
1 Comments:
  • At 7:09 PM, April 20, 2006, Blogger Justin Hawks said…

    Thanks for the nice comment. I do believe 100% that the Bible is "perfect" because it's author is the "perfect God and Christ" (speaking through divinely inspired men who wrote the Bible's books). Of course there's no way I can adequately address here all the issues that may prevent you or anyone from believing the divinity of the Bible (for instance, do you think it has contradictions? How can it be perfect if it was written by mere men? How do you know Jesus really rose from the dead and it's not a lie, etc, etc). I may not know all the answers in my head, but I do have them readily available when people ask, PLEASE feel free to contact me personally if you want to discuss this further. As far as the "tolerance" thing, I don't pretend to be okay with another person's belief system if those beliefs lead a person to hell, to put it bluntly. Again, I love the individual (homosexual or not, Christian or not) but not necessarily his/her beliefs. I'm not meaning to sound harsh, but there is only ONE way to heaven, and all other "paths" (Buddhism, Islam, atheism, etc) are essentially the same in that they all lead away from the truth. Now I REALLY hesitate to say all this, b/c I'm afraid it may seem like I'm trying to sound "better" than other people, but I'm not meaning to at all. Again it's only by God's grace that I'm "saved" and have his Truth living in me, NOT because of who I am or anything I've done, b/c I sure as hell don't deserve it. This same grace is available to anyone who believes in Jesus as their Savior and repents of their sins, no matter who they are (Mister Rogers or Osama bin Laden). I'm not one ounce about hate at all.

     
Post a Comment
<< Home
 
Our Staff
The Archives
Want to go back and check out an older article for a first-read, re-read or to post a comment? Then click here to visit the RUnderground Archives!
Links We Recommend
Radford Related
Big South Sports
Big South Talk forum
Radford Campus Map
RU Hoops forum
RU Highlanders

Faith Related
The Bible
Got Questions? Answers Site
RU Campus Crusade for Christ
RU Chi Alpha Campus Ministries

News Related
Ann Coulter
Bill O'Reilly
Christian Post
Conservative Voice
Drudge Report
FOX News
Michael Savage
NewsMax
Rapture Ready
Religion News
Roanoke Times
RUnderground
Rush Limbaugh
The Tartan
TownHall News
Washington Times
WorldNetDaily

Sports Related
Baseball America
CBS Sportsline
ESPN
FOX Sports
Major League Baseball
Minor League Baseball
National Basketball Association
National Football League
National Hockey League
Pro Sports Daily
Rotoworld
Sports Illustrated
Yahoo Sports
Hit Counter
web counter
Thank you for visiting RUnderground. Please come back soon!